Students gather to protest preacher for ‘hate speech’

Protesters call for the university to ban Quad preacher Tom Rayborn from campus. Students have said Rayborn’s preaching qualifies as hate speech; university officials have said his speech is protected by the First Amendment.

The Quad preacher was a no-show on Wednesday, but that didn’t stop counter-protesters from calling for his removal from campus.

Tom Rayborn, of Alton, Illinois, has come to SIUE for years, standing on the Stratton Quadrangle to preach to the student body. On his permit application to SIUE, he states that his intent is to “preach the Gospel, talk with students about religious topics, [and] distribute religious material.”

Students have complained that Rayborn uses a megaphone to insult students, calling them “demons” and stating that they are going to hell.

Freshman Elly Bollinger and a few other students held a demonstration on Oct. 16 that was intended as a silent counter-protest to Rayborn, but became contentious. Other students joined them, then engaged in yelling back and forth with Rayborn, Bollinger said.

“We don’t think he should be able to shout at students like that,” Bollinger said. “It’s verbal harassment, and we should be able to feel comfortable on our own campus.”

Some students migrated to the Rock, where Rayborn continued shouting back at them. No physical violence took place, Bollinger said, but the shouting became aggressive.

As word spread of last week’s incident, at least two groups of students gathered on Wednesday for a much larger protest and to pass a petition calling for the university to rescind Rayborn’s permit.

Alex Aultman, president of the Gay-Straight Alliance at SIUE said it’s the university’s responsibility to make them feel safe on campus.

“Hearing this man preach about how I’m going to hell every Wednesday on my way to class does not make me feel safe or accepted on this campus,” Aultman said.

Several students wore horns as a deliberate counter-protest to Rayborn’s alleged calls that gay students are “demons,” and several wore capes and flags for gay pride, pansexual, nonbinary and bisexual pride, among others.

Protest signs included “God is love” and “We shouldn’t have hate at home.” Several chalk drawings across the quad quoted Biblical passages such as “Love thy neighbor” and “Hatred stirs up conflict but love covers all wrongs” — as well as a goose with a pride flag.

Protest co-organizer Kimberly Hickman said SIUE is a campus of diversity and Rayborn’s message violates that tradition.

“He has decided to speak about how he hates the gays and every other religion is false,” Hickman said. “We’re trying to bring awareness that there’s a number of students … that don’t think he should be allowed on campus to spread these hateful views, and we would like to see — not necessarily him off campus, although that would be great, but at least him without the megaphone on campus.”

Two petitions were circulating Wednesday: one from the Gay-Straight Alliance and one from the Philosophy Club.

“We want to make sure the university hears us,” Aultman said. “We have to walk through the quad every [Wednesday] hearing this man spewing hate. We’re not protesting religion, we are protesting the fact that he is using his religion to spread hate.”

University policy states that “demonstrative activity” is permitted on the quad in accordance with the First Amendment under certain guidelines. Among them are requirements that off-campus individuals must apply for a permit, the demonstration does not obstruct traffic or access, disrupt university business with excessive noise or threaten public safety.

Public safety is the focus of one of the petitions, arguing that Rayborn’s statements about LGBTQ+ students constitute a threat to their safety.

Junior Mina Mathenia believes that Rayborn’s message violates rule four of the campus’s demonstration policy, which states that protests may not create a “clear and present threat to public safety.”

“I think his words count as hate speech, and that that’s against what the campus stands for,” Mathenia said. 

Rich Walker, vice chancellor for administration, said that earlier in the semester, university officials listened to Rayborn’s speech with legal counsel and SIUE police, and did not hear anything that could be construed as a threat or hate speech.

“True, we haven’t listened to 100 percent of all of his speeches, so there may be content that we haven’t encountered,” Walker said.

Walker said that as an “intellectual, diverse and inclusive community,” the university needs to respect differences and disagree in a respectful manner.

“It pains me whenever someone — a young person especially — is targeted with messages that don’t come from a place of caring or respect,” Walker said. “So many people get it wrong, and I am saddened when anyone feels somehow lessened because of someone else’s detestable words. Still, we can be a stronger university because of a healthy dialogue.”

Walker said that there was video and audio footage from Oct. 16, which has been reviewed by university officials. Unfortunately, he said, it was the counter-protesters who “acted inappropriately by cussing at him and flipping him off.” He said some observers were up close to Rayborn and yelling expletives in his face, which some witnesses verified.

Walker said that over time, the university has narrowed Rayborn’s permitted physical space, reduced the equipment and volume of his equipment and asked SIUE police to have an officer on site whenever he speaks.

“We’ve met with him numerous times about his rhetoric, and I have personally sat and listened to his remarks,” Walker said. “But unless he breaks the law, he is free to speak his opinions – far outside our own beliefs and values as they may be.”

Rayborn was not present on Wednesday despite having an approved permit for his usual Wednesday protest. However, when reached by email, he said he was “out of town this week at four campuses.”

The Alestle was not able to speak extensively with Rayborn at the time of publication.

At least five SIUE Police officers were present on Wednesday, remaining outside the main quad circle and observing the protest.

SIUE Police Chief Kevin Schmoll said that police activity on Oct. 16 was limited to an unrelated incident: At the same time as Rayborn’s protest, a Collinsville man came on the quad wearing a helmet and carrying a shield in the shape of a white cross. He also had a bag that contained two pairs of nunchucks, which are not a banned weapon on campus. The man allegedly said he used them to “fight Lucifer,” and told police he was there to register for classes, Schmoll said.

The man was removed from campus and put on a bus back to Collinsville. Schmoll said he did not know the man’s name.

(9) comments

Dan Delion

When I saw these guys the 1st time it was not a surprise to me that there were protesters. Not because I heard anything they said being questionable but because they were preaching what they believe is the truth from a Christian perspective. The claim that some feel "unsafe" because of these people simply sharing their faith as they have for apparently many many years isn't just laughable it's ridiculous, dishonest, and hateful. My Girlfriend has had several conversations with them and they've never been anything but respectful to her and everyone else that we have seen. It doesn't sound like they've ever said anything that goes against traditional views but people are so immoral these days that they feel self condemned over their own immorality and I guess don't like for anybody to disagree with their view. There's nothing hateful that I've seen and in talking to some of the protesters they told stories of things that happened that they heard from someone else who heard from someone else who heard from someone else and none of it sounded credible and all of it was apparently from years ago when they weren't even on the campus. Bottom line is 2000 years ago people 1st started to preach the gospel and there were "haters" that stirred up trouble and mobs to attack them and lie about what they were saying. I find it remarkable to watch this in modern times in America. And the only person being disruptive is the one college professor that apparently has taken it upon herself to declare everything that she doesn't agree with as "hate speech" as she shouts them down with the megaphone and disrupts the entire campus which not a single student I found on campus agrees with. The fact that she is allowed to infringe on someone else's free speech is also questionable. Lastly the doxing of these people by one of the commenters shows you who is truly full of hate. Is a proverb that says "the wicked detest the upright". Is far as I can see objective Lee that's the only thing that's going on here. Just haters of people that want to oppress someone else for their religious views.

Kimberly Hickman

Hi, I'm the original organizer for all of these. This article is missing a lot of context and it is a shame that so many video interviews were taken and not even touched. Our protests are not about his religion, but about his actions and words that violate the universities rules for the free speech circle and the universities stance as a diverse and safe space campus. This preacher has singled out, harrassed, blocked, and spit on students in the recent past, just because he clocks them as gay, muslim, non-conforming, or non-christian.

It is also a shame that the writer neglected to mention that when the university stayed to listen to one of his speeches, they informed him in advance.

Mina Mathenia

My girlfriend and I started protesting him last year, and have been doing it since the beginning of this semester as well. We organized the Philosophy club's protest.

I agree that it is sad they did the video interviews and ignored them. They definitely tried to paint this movement as a silly one that's against religion. Honestly, I think they wanted to make it so that people would look at it and think "haha, snowflakes!". The issue is that he yells at women and calls them whores. The issue is that he tells people they were molested as children. That is never okay, "snowflake" or not.

I wish they would have stated that last thing too. Of course he will be on his best behavior if he knows they're listening. That's why he's calmed down recently. I filled out an accuracy report on the article, not sure if you got one through your email but maybe it would be good to let them know somehow?

Omar Saeed

Those "hateful views" are standard views within not only christian theology but also other abrahamic religions. There was a sign at this protest that said "G-D IS A DOG", it is hypocritical to lament "hatespeech" from one person while spewing it yourself. This sign is not only offensive to christians but also to jews and muslims. Absolutely shameful display.

Also to the comment above mine, you posting his address with the implication of harassing him is a crime in most places. Certainly against the terms and conditions of this publication no doubt.

Kimberly Hickman

Hi, in response to your comment on the sign i'd like to clarify some things. Firstly there were two groups out that day, and they were completely unrelated in their methods but shared the same goal. The group i am heading is perfectly fine with his religious views, but he has done and said things in the past that go against campus policy regarding the free speech circle. We are protesting the continued allowance of this preacher in particular for his actions and refusal to change, not for what he believes.

Mina Mathenia

The Philosophy club is also fine with his religious views. It seems like readers have been assuming that the protest is against Christianity, due to how the article portrayed the events. None of us feel that way, and many people protesting are religious and/or Christian. We are just against hate speech.

Mina Mathenia

As an organizer of the protest, I do not condone that person's comment. Please know that this protest is not about Christianity. Many of the protesters are Christian. There were two sides to this protest, and one side had a few people who put across the wrong message. We will try to correct that, as our problem is with his words, not his beliefs.

Nate Washe

I wonder what he would think if people showed up at the Redeeming Grace Church where he is the Pastor in Alton. 3030 Brown Street, Alton, IL 62002 seems not very far away according to Google Maps.

Dan Delion

How about posting your address in stead of docks in someone else there hater?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.